Do you support a (monthly) minimum income, regardless whether you work or not? Why, or why not?
By - move_on_be_strong3
Only for the disabled, widows, orphans and others who need it.
“Disabled” is a very flexible term.
None for chads?
Chads live off donations
Chads don't accept donations, they make donations.
if someone can't find a job or can't work for a specific reason then yes. but if they just don't want to work then no
We have a similar system like you described in Germany. Unfortunately many people in need of that money face discrimination in the process of getting it, plus it‘s a ton of bureaucracy. The state needs a ton of people checking if the person in need actually needs the money, how much, for how long, when he finally gets to work etc.
yeah, it must be hard to apply this
Why tf you never add a results option
Just vote paki
░░░░░░███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃ ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ I███████████████████]. ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...
Waste tax money AND cause inflation? Where do I sign up?
Of course people would pay more taxes when this system is active. There were multiple studies made around this topic, and the results were that there wouldn‘t be any loss of tax money or any other type of loss.
Increasing tax rate is huge red flag and a desperate option most of the time because everyone would be against it. If a policy relies on increasing taxes it's an automatic no. Left wing parties often talk about cutting something like the military budget to fund some services, because no one would vote for higher taxes.
Middle East is c*mmunist and it is proven by the results.
How is it communistic? What don‘t you like about it?
Yes I do. I believe there are studies who investigated this and determined that it would result in a positive balance in a country's budget (a country would make more money off of this policy then it spends).
Those who do not work. Will starve. -Vladimir Lenin.
Yes give me shekels
I support it cause I'm lazy and I honestly don't feel like working, so yes I wouldn't mind it
No because some retards dont know how to spend money, just make essential services cheaper or free.
With that system being enforced, some social aspects would be taken away, for which the money of the minimum income would compensate. With the system of minimum income there would also be a lot less bureaucracy = saving money for the state.
Since both of the approaches are pro-social, they would both need a rise of taxes for the individual. Do you think people of your area would agree with that?
Of course not
You must earn your pay.
"If a man will not work, he shall not eat."
شكله ما عندك سعودة
No pain no gain.
No because employment rates suck with a minimum wage.
Doesn’t that just lead to inflation?
I think it should be allowed but I’m afraid some might abuse it
why should someone who doesn't want to work get payed?
Its not necessarily about not wanting to work, but to have a feeling of security. Many people who work are afraid of losing their job or not having enough money when they retire. This way they know they will always have enough money to live indoors, have health insurance and food, to have basic needs met. Most people will want to work in their lives, but maybe are just not feeling it for a month or three, this number according to studies however is very low.
Support for the ones that actually have a job and are trying to get money
Fuck the ones that get money and drink and smoke drugs